Central Tendency

From Practical Statistics for Educators
Revision as of 08:18, 25 August 2019 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "''Having finally mastered the skills necessary to report my data, and thanks to the help from fellow students in my doctoral program, I was ready to write up a description of...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Having finally mastered the skills necessary to report my data, and thanks to the help from fellow students in my doctoral program, I was ready to write up a description of what all the numbers meant. I was excited to have reached this point in my central tendency assignment, as there is one thing I love doing, and that is write. Finally, something I might be good at! However, this also meant that I needed to understand and be able to explain what all the numbers meant.

In October of 2007 during the kindergarten year, the Letter Naming Fluency ( LNF) portion of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (Dibels) was administered to a class of 18 kindergarten students, 10 males and 8 females. The SPSS helped to process the following data regarding the testing administration. The mean score for the eighteen students for the Beginning LNF portion of Dibels was 32.33 with the median or midpoint being 35.0(Table 1). By gender, the boys in the class scored slightly lower with the mean score of 32.30 and the midpoint or median score of 34.50 as compared to the girls’ mean score of 32.38 and a median of 37.00(Table 5).

The standard deviation is based on all the scores in the group and is determined by how much each score deviates from the mean, or in other words, it is an estimate of what the range of scores probably was. The standard deviation tells me that in the Beginning and Ending LNF administration, all students tested, in a similar range-16.01 and 16.87(Tables 1 and 2). However, in looking at the Beginning LNF scores analyzed by gender, there is a large discrepancy between how well the boys did when compared to the girls. There was a higher standard of deviation for the boys than the girls, respectively 16.34 for the boys and 6.71 for the girls. In trying to understand the possible reasons for this, one must consider birthdates. Although birthdates were not considered in this collection of data, it is important to note that there was a higher incidence of younger birth dates for the boys than the girls which might account for this wide range in the boys’ scores.

The Z scores in this statistical analysis refer to how many standard deviations a particular raw score lies above or below the group means. Table 6 indicates the range of Z scores for the students who had taken the Ending LNF portion of the Dibels test. The score range from 1.44, or 1.44 standard deviations above the group mean of 64.67 to -1.82, or 1.82 below the group mean of 64.67.


I actually felt that I began to really understand what everything meant as I was scripting my report. It was very helpful. Hope this helps someone!


contributed by Debbie Mumford