Difference between revisions of "Confidence Intervals"
(Created page with " == Creating Confidence Intervals == The use of confidence intervals is in part, due to the fact that the traditional and restricted framework of statistical significance tes...") |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| − | + | ''contributed by Mykal Kuslis, WCSU Cohort 8'' | |
Reference: | Reference: | ||
Meyers, S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A.J. (2017). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. (p.24-25) | Meyers, S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A.J. (2017). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. (p.24-25) | ||
Revision as of 16:30, 19 November 2019
Creating Confidence Intervals
The use of confidence intervals is in part, due to the fact that the traditional and restricted framework of statistical significance testing has not been universally endorsed, therefore creating the need for confidence intervals.
This comes down to a simple question, "Is it possible to assert something positive and tangible about the means of the groups in an experimental study?"
Instead of using significance level in a study, it maybe more beneficial to use a confidence interval (which is the opposite of the significance level).
For example, saying "the 6 month survival rate wan increased by 30 percentage points with a 99% confidence interval" than by simple saying the difference between the control group and experimental group was significant at the .01 level.
The creation of the confidence interval then, becomes the percentage remaining from the significance level. In this this case 100-1= 99%
contributed by Mykal Kuslis, WCSU Cohort 8
Reference:
Meyers, S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A.J. (2017). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. (p.24-25)
