<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Casimir007</id>
	<title>Practical Statistics for Educators - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Casimir007"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php/Special:Contributions/Casimir007"/>
	<updated>2026-09-25T01:11:39Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.31.16</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Contributions_here&amp;diff=532</id>
		<title>Contributions here</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Contributions_here&amp;diff=532"/>
		<updated>2025-12-16T00:28:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Casimir007: /* Student Contributors */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Editor ==&lt;br /&gt;
Frank LaBanca, EdD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Faculty Contributors ==&lt;br /&gt;
Karen Burke, EdD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patricia Cosentino, EdD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deborah Hardy, EdD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jennifer Mitchell, EdD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Student Contributors ==&lt;br /&gt;
Jennifer Blue&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
David Bozzuto&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ashley Brooksbank&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
David Ciskowski&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Katie Ciskowski&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paula Connolly&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cassandra Cosentino&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lisa Daigle&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sara Dalton&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jennifer Eraca&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mary Fernand&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Karen Fildes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas Fox&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nicole Griffin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kristina Hislop&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Damien Holst&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kaitlyn Kakadeles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britany Kuslis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mykal Kuslis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kara Kunst&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helen Knudsen&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Michael Minzloff&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sandra Peña&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sheri Prendergast&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Emily Rhew&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Ryan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tania Nicole Sutherland&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joseph W. Sullivan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scott Trungadi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Benson Casimir&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Casimir007</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Central_Tendency&amp;diff=491</id>
		<title>Central Tendency</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Central_Tendency&amp;diff=491"/>
		<updated>2025-11-14T06:13:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Casimir007: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Central Tendency is commonly referred to as the &amp;quot;measure of central tendency&amp;quot;.  A measure of central tendency is used to describe a data set by identifying the central position within that set of data.  In statistics, the three most commonly used measures of central tendency are mean, median, and mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mean: The mean is the average of all the numbers within a data set.  To find the mean value, one would add up all the values in a data set and divide that sum by the total number of data points within the data set.&lt;br /&gt;
Example - 3+4+5+6+7 = 25.   There are 5 values in this data set.  25/5 = 5.  In this scenario the mean, or average, is 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Median: The median is the middle point in a sorted set of data.  The median is identified by organizing the data set into order of magnitude (starting with the smallest number).&lt;br /&gt;
Once sorted the median is identified as the number directly in the middle of that sorted data.&lt;br /&gt;
Example - 6, 9, 23, 15, 2.  If we put this data set in order by magnitude it is displayed as: 2, 6, 9, 15, 23.  In this data set 9 is the median.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mode: The mode is the number that occurs most frequently in a data set.&lt;br /&gt;
Example - 2, 3, 15, 3, 5, 7, 8, 3, 2, 1, 10, 9.   &lt;br /&gt;
In this data set, 3, is the number that occurs most frequently and would be identified as the mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Scott Trungadi&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Having finally mastered the skills necessary to report my data, and thanks to the help from fellow students in my doctoral program, I was ready to write up a description of what all the numbers meant. I was excited to have reached this point in my central tendency assignment, as there is one thing I love doing, and that is write. Finally, something I might be good at! However, this also meant that I needed to understand and be able to explain what all the numbers meant.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October of 2007 during the kindergarten year, the Letter Naming Fluency&lt;br /&gt;
( LNF) portion of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (Dibels) was administered to a class of 18 kindergarten students, 10 males and 8 females.&lt;br /&gt;
The SPSS helped to process the following data regarding the testing administration. The mean score for the eighteen students for the Beginning LNF portion of Dibels was 32.33 with the median or midpoint being 35.0(Table 1). By gender, the boys in the class scored slightly lower with the mean score of 32.30 and the midpoint or median score of 34.50 as compared to the girls’ mean score of 32.38 and a median of 37.00(Table 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standard deviation is based on all the scores in the group and is determined by how much each score deviates from the mean, or in other words, it is an estimate of what the range of scores probably was. The standard deviation tells me that in the Beginning and Ending LNF administration, all students tested, in a similar range-16.01 and 16.87(Tables 1 and 2).&lt;br /&gt;
However, in looking at the Beginning LNF scores analyzed by gender, there is a large discrepancy between how well the boys did when compared to the girls. There was a higher standard of deviation for the boys than the girls, respectively 16.34 for the boys and 6.71 for the girls. In trying to understand the possible reasons for this, one must consider birthdates. Although birthdates were not considered in this collection of data, it is important to note that there was a higher incidence of younger birth dates for the boys than the girls which might account for this wide range in the boys’ scores.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Z scores in this statistical analysis refer to how many standard deviations a particular raw score lies above or below the group means. Table 6 indicates the range of Z scores for the students who had taken the Ending LNF portion of the Dibels test. The score range from 1.44, or 1.44 standard deviations above the group mean of 64.67 to -1.82, or 1.82 below the group mean of 64.67.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;I actually felt that I began to really understand what everything meant as I was scripting my report. It was very helpful. Hope this helps someone!&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Debbie Mumford&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Skewness and Central Tendency&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Skeweness.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Identifying where the mean, median, and mode are in relation to each other can help to determine the skew of a curve. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a normal distribution, the mean, median, and mode will all be very close (mean = median = mode)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a distribution that is skewed &amp;#039;&amp;#039;left&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, otherwise known as a negatively skewed distribution, it is outliers on the lower end of the number line that is impacting the shape of the curve. In a curve that is skewed left the mean (which is the mathematical average) will be furthest to the left on the number line, the median remains at the mid point of the distribution on the number line, and the mode will be the farthest point to the right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a distribution that is skewed &amp;#039;&amp;#039;right&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, otherwise known as a positively skewed distribution, it is outliers on the higher end of the number line that is impacting the shape of the curve. In a curve that is skewed right the mean (which is the mathematical average) will be furthest to the right on the number line, the median remains at the mid point of the distribution on the number line, and the mode will be the farthest point to the left. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Ashley Brooksbank&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Image citation: Statistics: Basic Statistics II. (n.d.). Retrieved from &amp;#039;&amp;#039;https://guides.douglascollege.ca/c.php?g=408742&amp;amp;p=2970198.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Descriptive Statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Descriptive statistics are very important because if we simply presented our raw data it would be hard to visualize what the data was showing, especially if there was a lot of it. Descriptive statistics therefore enables us to present the data in a more meaningful way, which allows simpler interpretation of the data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measures of central tendency: these are ways of describing the central position of a frequency distribution for a group of data. In this case, the frequency distribution is simply the distribution and pattern of marks scored by the 100 students from the lowest to the highest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measures of spread: these are ways of summarizing a group of data by describing how spread out the scores are. For example, the mean score of our 100 students may be 65 out of 100. However, not all students will have scored 65 marks. Rather, their scores will be spread out. Some will be lower and others higher. Measures of spread help us to summarize how spread out these scores are.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both of these measures are important to calculate through SPSS prior to conducting other analyses as they can speak to you about what your data is saying and inform you of the next steps you should take.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Sheri Prendergast&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Central Tendency&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most basic statistical concepts in educational research is central tendency, which determines the median or the average of a data set, providing a single figure that can best represent a whole group of observations. The knowledge of central tendency enables teachers to analyze the data at the classroom and school level effectively, and draw conclusions regarding the performance of students and the effectiveness of the instructional process. The three significant measures include mean, median, and mode. The arithmetic mean is the average of all the data points, which is calculated by adding all the data points and dividing them by the number of cases. It suits interval or ratio data that are symmetrically distributed. Mean is, however, sensitive to the outliers with a few very high or very low scores having the ability to skew the mean. The median, the middle value that appears when all the values have been ranked, is not sensitive to extreme values and is applied in the case of skewed data. The mode, which is the most common score, is particularly useful when the data are nominal or categorical, such as the most popular grade or preferred learning style. In the educational sphere, both measures narrate a different tale. The mean reading score in a classroom can be 85, for instance, but the median can be 90, implying that some low achievers dragged the mean score. These measures can be calculated in SPSS under Analyze - Descriptive Statistics - Frequencies. With careful choice and interpretation of the appropriate measure of central tendency, teachers will be able to see trends and detect learning differences, and present findings in a manner that informs teaching and promotes equity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Casimir007&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Casimir007</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Central_Tendency&amp;diff=490</id>
		<title>Central Tendency</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Central_Tendency&amp;diff=490"/>
		<updated>2025-11-14T06:13:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Casimir007: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Central Tendency is commonly referred to as the &amp;quot;measure of central tendency&amp;quot;.  A measure of central tendency is used to describe a data set by identifying the central position within that set of data.  In statistics, the three most commonly used measures of central tendency are mean, median, and mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mean: The mean is the average of all the numbers within a data set.  To find the mean value, one would add up all the values in a data set and divide that sum by the total number of data points within the data set.&lt;br /&gt;
Example - 3+4+5+6+7 = 25.   There are 5 values in this data set.  25/5 = 5.  In this scenario the mean, or average, is 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Median: The median is the middle point in a sorted set of data.  The median is identified by organizing the data set into order of magnitude (starting with the smallest number).&lt;br /&gt;
Once sorted the median is identified as the number directly in the middle of that sorted data.&lt;br /&gt;
Example - 6, 9, 23, 15, 2.  If we put this data set in order by magnitude it is displayed as: 2, 6, 9, 15, 23.  In this data set 9 is the median.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mode: The mode is the number that occurs most frequently in a data set.&lt;br /&gt;
Example - 2, 3, 15, 3, 5, 7, 8, 3, 2, 1, 10, 9.   &lt;br /&gt;
In this data set, 3, is the number that occurs most frequently and would be identified as the mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Scott Trungadi&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Having finally mastered the skills necessary to report my data, and thanks to the help from fellow students in my doctoral program, I was ready to write up a description of what all the numbers meant. I was excited to have reached this point in my central tendency assignment, as there is one thing I love doing, and that is write. Finally, something I might be good at! However, this also meant that I needed to understand and be able to explain what all the numbers meant.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October of 2007 during the kindergarten year, the Letter Naming Fluency&lt;br /&gt;
( LNF) portion of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (Dibels) was administered to a class of 18 kindergarten students, 10 males and 8 females.&lt;br /&gt;
The SPSS helped to process the following data regarding the testing administration. The mean score for the eighteen students for the Beginning LNF portion of Dibels was 32.33 with the median or midpoint being 35.0(Table 1). By gender, the boys in the class scored slightly lower with the mean score of 32.30 and the midpoint or median score of 34.50 as compared to the girls’ mean score of 32.38 and a median of 37.00(Table 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standard deviation is based on all the scores in the group and is determined by how much each score deviates from the mean, or in other words, it is an estimate of what the range of scores probably was. The standard deviation tells me that in the Beginning and Ending LNF administration, all students tested, in a similar range-16.01 and 16.87(Tables 1 and 2).&lt;br /&gt;
However, in looking at the Beginning LNF scores analyzed by gender, there is a large discrepancy between how well the boys did when compared to the girls. There was a higher standard of deviation for the boys than the girls, respectively 16.34 for the boys and 6.71 for the girls. In trying to understand the possible reasons for this, one must consider birthdates. Although birthdates were not considered in this collection of data, it is important to note that there was a higher incidence of younger birth dates for the boys than the girls which might account for this wide range in the boys’ scores.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Z scores in this statistical analysis refer to how many standard deviations a particular raw score lies above or below the group means. Table 6 indicates the range of Z scores for the students who had taken the Ending LNF portion of the Dibels test. The score range from 1.44, or 1.44 standard deviations above the group mean of 64.67 to -1.82, or 1.82 below the group mean of 64.67.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;I actually felt that I began to really understand what everything meant as I was scripting my report. It was very helpful. Hope this helps someone!&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Debbie Mumford&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Skewness and Central Tendency&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Skeweness.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Identifying where the mean, median, and mode are in relation to each other can help to determine the skew of a curve. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a normal distribution, the mean, median, and mode will all be very close (mean = median = mode)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a distribution that is skewed &amp;#039;&amp;#039;left&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, otherwise known as a negatively skewed distribution, it is outliers on the lower end of the number line that is impacting the shape of the curve. In a curve that is skewed left the mean (which is the mathematical average) will be furthest to the left on the number line, the median remains at the mid point of the distribution on the number line, and the mode will be the farthest point to the right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a distribution that is skewed &amp;#039;&amp;#039;right&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, otherwise known as a positively skewed distribution, it is outliers on the higher end of the number line that is impacting the shape of the curve. In a curve that is skewed right the mean (which is the mathematical average) will be furthest to the right on the number line, the median remains at the mid point of the distribution on the number line, and the mode will be the farthest point to the left. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Ashley Brooksbank&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Image citation: Statistics: Basic Statistics II. (n.d.). Retrieved from &amp;#039;&amp;#039;https://guides.douglascollege.ca/c.php?g=408742&amp;amp;p=2970198.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Descriptive Statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Descriptive statistics are very important because if we simply presented our raw data it would be hard to visualize what the data was showing, especially if there was a lot of it. Descriptive statistics therefore enables us to present the data in a more meaningful way, which allows simpler interpretation of the data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measures of central tendency: these are ways of describing the central position of a frequency distribution for a group of data. In this case, the frequency distribution is simply the distribution and pattern of marks scored by the 100 students from the lowest to the highest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measures of spread: these are ways of summarizing a group of data by describing how spread out the scores are. For example, the mean score of our 100 students may be 65 out of 100. However, not all students will have scored 65 marks. Rather, their scores will be spread out. Some will be lower and others higher. Measures of spread help us to summarize how spread out these scores are.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both of these measures are important to calculate through SPSS prior to conducting other analyses as they can speak to you about what your data is saying and inform you of the next steps you should take.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Sheri Prendergast&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Central Tendency&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most basic statistical concepts in educational research is central tendency, which determines the median or the average of a data set, providing a single figure that can best represent a whole group of observations. The knowledge of central tendency enables teachers to analyze the data at the classroom and school level effectively, and draw conclusions regarding the performance of students and the effectiveness of the instructional process. The three significant measures include mean, median, and mode. The arithmetic mean is the average of all the data points, which is calculated by adding all the data points and dividing them by the number of cases. It suits interval or ratio data that are symmetrically distributed. Mean is, however, sensitive to the outliers with a few very high or very low scores having the ability to skew the mean. The median, the middle value that appears when all the values have been ranked, is not sensitive to extreme values and is applied in the case of skewed data. The mode, which is the most common score, is particularly useful when the data are nominal or categorical, such as the most popular grade or preferred learning style. In the educational sphere, both measures narrate a different tale. The mean reading score in a classroom can be 85, for instance, but the median can be 90, implying that some low achievers dragged the mean score. These measures can be calculated in SPSS under Analyze - Descriptive Statistics - Frequencies. With careful choice and interpretation of the appropriate measure of central tendency, teachers will be able to see trends and detect learning differences, and present findings in a manner that informs teaching and promotes equity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Casimir007&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Casimir007</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Beyond_the_ANOVA&amp;diff=489</id>
		<title>Beyond the ANOVA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Beyond_the_ANOVA&amp;diff=489"/>
		<updated>2025-11-14T06:11:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Casimir007: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Analysis of Variance is a powerful statistical technique for analyzing data.  But what happens when we have conditions that go beyond the ANOVA and we need more?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2-way ANOVA ==&lt;br /&gt;
A two-way ANOVA is used when each participant in a study has scores on three variables: two independent variables (IV) with two or more levels and a dependent variable (DV). For example, a two-way ANOVA can be used to evaluate the effects of three different methods of math instruction on math achievement scores for boys and girls. In this example the first IV is gender which has two levels: male and female; the second IV is math instruction which has three levels: Method 1, Method 2, and a Control; the third variable is the DV-math achievement scores. The two-way ANOVA starts with an omnibus test to determine if there are any significant effects on the DV based on each IV and the interaction of the IV&amp;#039;s. If the omnibus test indicates significance, then follow-up tests are required to specifically identify where the significant differences exist. A two-way ANOVA can be used to analyze data from experimental studies, quasi-experimental studies, and field studies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Helen Knudsen&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
== k-way ANOVA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Repeated Measures ANOVA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Repeated measures ANOVA, as in any ANOVA, compares the means of different groups. What a repeated measures ANOVA allows the researcher to do, however, is to compare data on the same characteristic when samples are collected at different times (i.e. within a longitudinal study). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A repeated measures ANOVA can also be used when members of a random sample are matched based upon some criteria. The data collected at various points by the matched pairs in the study can then be analyzed with this method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Submitted by Karen A. Fildes&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ANCOVA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ANCOVA Steps in SPSS &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
→ Select Analyze &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
→ General Linear Model &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
→ Univariate&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
→ Put the DV in the Dependent Variable box and the IV in the Fixed Factors box. Proceed to put the covariates of interest in the Covariate(s) box.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
→ Click on the Options button and move the IV over to the Display Means For box.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
→ Click on Compare Main Effects and select Bonferroni from the Confidence interval adjustment menu to request post hoc tests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
→ Select Descriptive Statistics, Estimate of effect size and homogeneity tests from the display options.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When writing up the results, it is common to report certain figures from the ANCOVA table.&lt;br /&gt;
F(df between, df within)= Test Statistic, p =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.531229!/file/MASH_ANCOVA_SPSS.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Britany Kuslis, WCSU Cohort 8&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rothwell, Joanne. “ANCOVA in SPSS.”  www.statstutor.ac.uk, University of Sheffield, www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.531229!/file/MASH_ANCOVA_SPSS.pdf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MANOVA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Multivariate Analysis of Variance, also known as the MANOVA, is used when there are multiple dependent variables and you are looking at multiple factors. The only difference between an ANOVA and a MANOVA is that the ANOVA has the limitation of only allowing for a single dependent variable while the MANOVA allows for more. For example, using the MANOVA analysis, a researcher could examine Math Achievement &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;and&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; Reading Achievement scores. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
An example research question for a MANOVA would be:&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a significant difference in Math Achievement (computation, problem solving and numeracy) and Math Self Efficacy for students who participate in an after school treatment program for either one day per week (Program A), three days per week (Program B), or the traditional math curriculum.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;DV 1: Math Achievement&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Level 1: Computation&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Level 2: Problem Solving&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Level 3: Numeracy&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;DV 2: Self Efficacy&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;1V 1: Math Program&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Level 1: Program A&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Level 2: Program B&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Level 3: Comparison/Control&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Karen Fildes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MANCOVA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is a statistical test that is applied to compare the means of three or more groups at the same time to find out whether at least one of them significantly differs. It is a t-test extension and is normally used in education research to compare various instructional practices, grade levels, or interventions. ANOVA works by dividing the total variance in the data into two components: one between-group variance (variation between group means) and the other within-group variance (variation within each group). The F-statistic is the ratio between these two variances. When the F-value is significant and the p-value is less than 05, it is an indication that one of the group means is not equal to the others.&lt;br /&gt;
An example is that an instructional leader can apply ANOVA to determine the performance of students who have been taught through three reading strategies: phonics-based, balanced literacy, and whole-language instruction. In case the results of ANOVA are significant, the results of post-hoc tests (Example is Tukey HSD or Bonferroni) indicate which particular groups differ. This is necessary since ANOVA does not inform us of the location of differences, but merely that they exist. In SPSS, do this analysis with Analyze - Compare Means - One-Way ANOVA. In the case of factorial designs with two independent variables (e.g., teaching method and grade level), a researcher can employ Two-Way ANOVA to examine interactions between variables. ANOVA assumes that there must be normality, independence, and homogeneity of variances. The violations might need other methods, including non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis). Knowledge of ANOVA helps teachers to evaluate the effectiveness of programs accurately, objectively comparing various strategies to stimulate the improvement of instruction and resource distribution.&lt;br /&gt;
 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Casimir007&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Casimir007</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Beyond_the_ANOVA&amp;diff=488</id>
		<title>Beyond the ANOVA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Beyond_the_ANOVA&amp;diff=488"/>
		<updated>2025-11-14T06:10:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Casimir007: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Analysis of Variance is a powerful statistical technique for analyzing data.  But what happens when we have conditions that go beyond the ANOVA and we need more?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2-way ANOVA ==&lt;br /&gt;
A two-way ANOVA is used when each participant in a study has scores on three variables: two independent variables (IV) with two or more levels and a dependent variable (DV). For example, a two-way ANOVA can be used to evaluate the effects of three different methods of math instruction on math achievement scores for boys and girls. In this example the first IV is gender which has two levels: male and female; the second IV is math instruction which has three levels: Method 1, Method 2, and a Control; the third variable is the DV-math achievement scores. The two-way ANOVA starts with an omnibus test to determine if there are any significant effects on the DV based on each IV and the interaction of the IV&amp;#039;s. If the omnibus test indicates significance, then follow-up tests are required to specifically identify where the significant differences exist. A two-way ANOVA can be used to analyze data from experimental studies, quasi-experimental studies, and field studies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Helen Knudsen&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
== k-way ANOVA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Repeated Measures ANOVA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Repeated measures ANOVA, as in any ANOVA, compares the means of different groups. What a repeated measures ANOVA allows the researcher to do, however, is to compare data on the same characteristic when samples are collected at different times (i.e. within a longitudinal study). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A repeated measures ANOVA can also be used when members of a random sample are matched based upon some criteria. The data collected at various points by the matched pairs in the study can then be analyzed with this method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Submitted by Karen A. Fildes&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ANCOVA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ANCOVA Steps in SPSS &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
→ Select Analyze &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
→ General Linear Model &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
→ Univariate&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
→ Put the DV in the Dependent Variable box and the IV in the Fixed Factors box. Proceed to put the covariates of interest in the Covariate(s) box.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
→ Click on the Options button and move the IV over to the Display Means For box.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
→ Click on Compare Main Effects and select Bonferroni from the Confidence interval adjustment menu to request post hoc tests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
→ Select Descriptive Statistics, Estimate of effect size and homogeneity tests from the display options.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When writing up the results, it is common to report certain figures from the ANCOVA table.&lt;br /&gt;
F(df between, df within)= Test Statistic, p =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.531229!/file/MASH_ANCOVA_SPSS.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Britany Kuslis, WCSU Cohort 8&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rothwell, Joanne. “ANCOVA in SPSS.”  www.statstutor.ac.uk, University of Sheffield, www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.531229!/file/MASH_ANCOVA_SPSS.pdf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MANOVA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Multivariate Analysis of Variance, also known as the MANOVA, is used when there are multiple dependent variables and you are looking at multiple factors. The only difference between an ANOVA and a MANOVA is that the ANOVA has the limitation of only allowing for a single dependent variable while the MANOVA allows for more. For example, using the MANOVA analysis, a researcher could examine Math Achievement &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;and&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; Reading Achievement scores. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
An example research question for a MANOVA would be:&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a significant difference in Math Achievement (computation, problem solving and numeracy) and Math Self Efficacy for students who participate in an after school treatment program for either one day per week (Program A), three days per week (Program B), or the traditional math curriculum.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;DV 1: Math Achievement&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Level 1: Computation&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Level 2: Problem Solving&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Level 3: Numeracy&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;DV 2: Self Efficacy&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;1V 1: Math Program&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Level 1: Program A&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Level 2: Program B&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Level 3: Comparison/Control&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Karen Fildes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MANCOVA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is a statistical test that is applied to compare the means of three or more groups at the same time to find out whether at least one of them significantly differs. It is a t-test extension and is normally used in education research to compare various instructional practices, grade levels, or interventions. ANOVA works by dividing the total variance in the data into two components: one between-group variance (variation between group means) and the other within-group variance (variation within each group). The F-statistic is the ratio between these two variances. When the F-value is significant and the p-value is less than 05, it is an indication that one of the group means is not equal to the others.&lt;br /&gt;
An example is that an instructional leader can apply ANOVA to determine the performance of students who have been taught through three reading strategies: phonics-based, balanced literacy, and whole-language instruction. In case the results of ANOVA are significant, the results of post-hoc tests (Example is Tukey HSD or Bonferroni) indicate which particular groups differ. This is necessary since ANOVA does not inform us of the location of differences, but merely that they exist. In SPSS, do this analysis with Analyze - Compare Means - One-Way ANOVA. In the case of factorial designs with two independent variables (e.g., teaching method and grade level), a researcher can employ Two-Way ANOVA to examine interactions between variables. ANOVA assumes that there must be normality, independence, and homogeneity of variances. The violations might need other methods, including non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis). Knowledge of ANOVA helps teachers to evaluate the effectiveness of programs accurately, objectively comparing various strategies to stimulate the improvement of instruction and resource distribution.&lt;br /&gt;
 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Casimir007&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Casimir007</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=T-test_-_What_is_a_t-test%3F&amp;diff=487</id>
		<title>T-test - What is a t-test?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=T-test_-_What_is_a_t-test%3F&amp;diff=487"/>
		<updated>2025-11-14T06:07:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Casimir007: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
t-tests are used to determine whether two samples are different.  For example, two fifth grade classes (random samples) took the same reading pre and post-tests.&lt;br /&gt;
The T-Test will help us analyze whether the two means are different.  This means we are comparing the mean of fifth-grade class #1 to fifth grade class #2 to see how they vary.&lt;br /&gt;
This will help to figure out if students are increasing performance overall or not.  Also, if there is significant difference, the t-test will help us figure out if we need to investigate further to see why there is significant differences in performance (intervention, supplemental materials, delivery method of instruction, etc).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
contributed by &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Tania Nicole Sutherland&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A t-test is an inferential test that is used to test the difference in the mean scores of two groups. It assists teachers in determining whether an instructional plan, intervention, or policy change has quantifiable outcomes. Otherwise put, it separates the differences that occurred by chance and the differences that may have occurred due to actual treatment effects. In educational research, two types of t-tests exist. Independent Samples t-test - applied in situations when two different groups of people (e.g., students in two classrooms) are compared. Paired Samples t-test - used when the researcher wants to compare the same group of scores before an intervention and after (an example is pre-test vs. post-test). The test produces a t-value and a p-value. When p is below 05, the researchers will make a conclusion that the difference between the group means is statistically significant, which means that it is likely to be a real effect. An illustration of this is that the difference in the score of a digital-learning group versus a textbook group ( t (48) = 2.62, p =.012) would not have been due to chance. In SPSS, perform this test using Analyze - Compare Means - Independent-Samples t-test or Paired-Samples t-test. Check the Levene Test to assume that variances are equal and normality holds. Also, it is best practice to report the effect size (Cohen&amp;#039;s d) to describe the magnitude of the difference, and not the statistical significance. T-tests provide an easy but efficient method of evaluating the teaching strategies, the use of technology, or the outcomes of the program as a teacher. They endorse an evidence-based reflection culture, which allows teachers to promote evidence-based change in instruction.&lt;br /&gt;
 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Casimir007&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Casimir007</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Pearson_r&amp;diff=486</id>
		<title>Pearson r</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Pearson_r&amp;diff=486"/>
		<updated>2025-11-14T06:04:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Casimir007: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Also known as Pearson&amp;#039;s product-moment correlation.  This technique is used to correlate the raw scores of two variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also visit http://psych.csufresno.edu/psy144/Content/Statistics/relationship_strength.html for more information on Pearson r.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Kara Kunst&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also referred to as the Pearson Correlation Coefficient Squared, it is the proportion of variance in the criterion variable that can be accounted for by the predictor variable. (from Dr. Nancy Heilbronner)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Mary Fernand&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Pearson r scores cannot exceed 1.00 or -1.00 (range is between -1.00 and 1.00). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Pearson r score (say for example .80) is the number where the distribution will peak, and the remaining distribution will spread out around the number. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Mykal Kuslis, WCSU Cohort 8&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meyers, S., Gamst, G., &amp;amp; Guarino, A.J. (2017). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. (P. 21)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A &amp;quot;real life example&amp;quot; of using correlations to gauge winter weather==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every teacher in New England has a vested interest in understanding how winter weather may impact the school calendar. I recently heard an interview with Judah Cohen on NPR, and sourced an older article from the Washington Post which includes a graph, which illuminates how this meteorologist who works for the firm, Atmospheric and Environmental Research, uses correlations to forecast East Coast weather. Specifically, Cohen evaluates the Siberian snow cover in October to predict winter weather in New England (Samenow, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because we’ve learned about correlational statistics, specifically what’s implied by the correlation coefficient or r-value, we can look beyond the narrative offered in the Washington Post article, which describes the statistical correlation as “striking.” In fact, we can look at the r =.810 in the graph below, and determine that because this number is close to 1, the Snow Advance Index (which relates to the Siberian snow cover) and the Arctic Oscillation (which produces the winter weather patterns in the Northeast) are strongly positively correlated (Hinkle, Wiersma, &amp;amp; Jurs, 2003, pp.98-99). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:winter.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the strong positive correlation, teachers in New England might pay a little more attention to what’s happening in Siberia in October to determine how much hot chocolate to buy in advance of snow days and how far those snow days will cause us to overshoot our districts’ June calendars. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References: &lt;br /&gt;
Hinkle, D.E., Wiersma, W., &amp;amp; Jurs, S.G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th edition). Boston, M.A.: Houghton Mifflin Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Samenow, J. (2013). Judah Cohen’s winter outlook: A downer for East Coast winter weather lovers. The Washington Post. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Emily Kilbourn&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep in mind that Pearson r is not reporting a cause and effect relationship, since consideration for classification of independent and dependent variables is not taken into account. However, it is a good measure for seeing the strength of relationship between two variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Lauren Moyer&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How to Find the Pearson Correlation (r) in SPSS==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In SPSS, follow these steps to find the r value:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Once you have the two variables you want to compare, click correlate.&lt;br /&gt;
2. Choose bivariate&lt;br /&gt;
3. Move the variables you want to compare over to the right box using the arrow.&lt;br /&gt;
4. Make sure Pearson is checked off in the window&lt;br /&gt;
5. Select two-tailed&lt;br /&gt;
6. Click flag significant correlations- asterisks will flag a significant correlation.&lt;br /&gt;
7. Click ok and a table will be generated with the Pearson correlation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Lisa Daigle&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The strength and direction of the linear relationship between two continuous variables are determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). It is between -1.00 and +1.00, in which the sign is applied to indicate direction and the value is used to demonstrate strength. The positive correlation, like r = +0.75, means that the better one variable is, the better the other variable (hours spent studying and test scores). The negative correlation, like r = -0.60, implies that the higher one is, the lower the other one is (absences and grades). A correlation value near zero means that there is no significant correlation. In research studies in the education field, correlation helps in demonstrating trends without necessarily having to presuppose causality. A positive correlation between teacher collaboration and student achievement is strong enough to show that there is a relationship between the two, but it does not mean that one causes the other; rather, external factors like school culture or resources cause them both. This distinction is critical in the moral and proper interpretation of data. To do analysis in SPSS is Analyze - Correlate - Bivariate.&lt;br /&gt;
The outcome shows the Pearson r and P value, which is the level of significance. A correlation below p =.05 is taken to be statistically significant. The researchers tend to understand the strength of r such that values from 0.10 - 0.29 (weak), 0.30-0.49 (moderate), and more than 0.50 (strong). Also, a scatterplot of data allows one to see the trend and the trend of the relationship. Data-driven leadership relies on correlational thinking. It will enable the educators to determine possible predictors of achievement, evaluate the relationship between attitudes and outcomes, and determine the consistency of school practices. Through learning to correlate, educational leaders will be able to go beyond intuition to evidence-based inquiry.&lt;br /&gt;
 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Casimir007&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Casimir007</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Standard_deviation&amp;diff=485</id>
		<title>Standard deviation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Standard_deviation&amp;diff=485"/>
		<updated>2025-11-14T06:01:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Casimir007: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Why bother finding standard deviation? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Standard deviation can be tedious to calculate by hand, but the value found can provide some very good insight into a set of data, particularly when considered in conjunction with one or more of the measures of central tendency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a good example.  Suppose I had two sets of data.  The first, which I will call Set 1, has these characteristics:  n = 10 (there are ten pieces of data), mean = medium = mode = 6, the minimum value in Set 1 is 1, and the maximum value in Set 1 is 11 (so the range is 10).  The second set of data, whcih I will call Set 2, has exactly the same characteristics (i.e., n = 10, mean = medium = mode = 6, min = 1, max = 11 and range = 10) as Set 1. Would you think that the sets of data had exactly the same numbers in them?  They might, but they might not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, consider this additional information regarding the sets:  Set 1 has a standard deviation of 3.87, but Set 2 has a standard deviation of 2.24.  Could the sets consist of the same data now?  Hopefully, it is clear that they cannot.  But what do those two values (i.e., 3.87 and 2.24) tell us about the sets, if anything?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remember that standard deviation is a &amp;quot;measure of dispersion&amp;quot;, so the numbers should communicate something about how dispersed the data are in each set. In this case, we would expect the data in the first set to be &amp;quot;more dispersed&amp;quot; than the the data of the second set (since 3.87 is greater than 2.24). In other words, if you were able to look at the data of the two sets side-by-side, the Set 2&amp;#039;s data would look more clustered around the number 6 than Set 1&amp;#039;s data did.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So let&amp;#039;s do that.  Here are the sets, in their entirety:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Set 1 = {1, 1, 1, 6, 6, 6, 6, 11, 11, 11}&lt;br /&gt;
Set 2 = {1, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 11}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the two sets have some similar qualities, it is easy to see that Set 2 has more of its data bunched near 6 than Set 1 does, or, conversely, that the data associated with Set 1 are more spread out than the data of Set 2. This fact can be determined without having to look at the actual elements of the two sets, however, by finding and understanding the standard deviations of the two sets.  Knowing that Set 1 has a standard deviation of 3.87 and that Set 2 has a standard deviation of 2.24 can provide a sense of these dispersions, particularly in a relative sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Chris Ruggiero&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Standard deviation measures how much dispersion there is around a mean score. A statistical formula is used to calculate the standard deviation. The larger the standard deviation, the further the score is from the mean; this can be a negative standard deviation and go below the mean or a positive standard deviation and be higher than the mean. The image below shows a normal bell curve, and where the percent of scores would lie in relation to each standard deviation.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:StandardDeviationBellCurve.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Normal+distribution+curve)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Cassandra Cosentino&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A great image to explain standard deviation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This data set comes from a high school student research project.  He did a pretest data collection, treatment, and then a post test.  Notice the pretest has a greater standard deviation than the postteest (spread) and that the posttest mean was greater than the pretest mean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Stnad crvs.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Frank LaBanca, EdD&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Standard Deviation Formula ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formula for a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;sample&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; standard deviation is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sample_Standard_Deviation_Formula.JPG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Worked Example ==&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a worked example for finding a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;sample standard deviation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; using a sample of 10 test scores:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Worked_example_of_sample_standard_deviation.JPG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formula for a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;population&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; standard deviation is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Population_Standard_Deviation_Formula.JPG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a work example for finding a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;population standard deviation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; using a population of 10 test scores (notice this is the same data and process as above, but with the slight difference of dividing by &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; instead of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n-1&amp;#039;&amp;#039;): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Worked_example_of_population_standard_deviation.JPG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by David Ciskowski&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Standard deviation (SD) provides the amount of variation or the consistency of a dataset by giving the difference between the individual data points and the mean. In the case where the mean indicates the center of the point, standard deviation is employed to demonstrate how tight or loose the scores are around the mean. They may be combined to provide a more detailed picture of student or program performance. When SD is small, the scores are highly clustered, like the students have scored in a similar fashion. In order to give an example, where the mean score is 85 and the SD is 2, the majority of students fell within the range of 83-87.&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, when SD is large, the scores are more dispersed, whereby some students are very far below or above the mean. The mean of two classes can be equal to 85, but one with a SD of 3 is more homogeneous than SD of 10. Two classes can be equal in terms of 85 average, but one with SD of 3 is more homogeneous than one with SD of 10. Variability in education assists teachers in interpreting the differences in achievement and consistency in teaching. When the SD in student performance is high, it may indicate that teaching methods are effective with one group of students and not with other students, which defines the necessity of differentiation.&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, a small SD may indicate fair results or a ceiling effect in the design of the assessment. The SD is acquired in SPSS under Analyze - Descriptive Statistics - Descriptives. The data can be represented as visual tools like boxplots or histograms, which can be easier to interpret to determine the variability. Many inferential tests, including t-tests and ANOVA, are also based on the SD, as it has an effect on confidence intervals and effect sizes. Concisely, the standard deviation will convert numerical data into useful narratives on learning diversity, program consistency, and classroom equity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Casimir007&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Casimir007</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Central_Tendency&amp;diff=484</id>
		<title>Central Tendency</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Central_Tendency&amp;diff=484"/>
		<updated>2025-11-14T05:58:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Casimir007: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Central Tendency is commonly referred to as the &amp;quot;measure of central tendency&amp;quot;.  A measure of central tendency is used to describe a data set by identifying the central position within that set of data.  In statistics, the three most commonly used measures of central tendency are mean, median, and mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mean: The mean is the average of all the numbers within a data set.  To find the mean value, one would add up all the values in a data set and divide that sum by the total number of data points within the data set.&lt;br /&gt;
Example - 3+4+5+6+7 = 25.   There are 5 values in this data set.  25/5 = 5.  In this scenario the mean, or average, is 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Median: The median is the middle point in a sorted set of data.  The median is identified by organizing the data set into order of magnitude (starting with the smallest number).&lt;br /&gt;
Once sorted the median is identified as the number directly in the middle of that sorted data.&lt;br /&gt;
Example - 6, 9, 23, 15, 2.  If we put this data set in order by magnitude it is displayed as: 2, 6, 9, 15, 23.  In this data set 9 is the median.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mode: The mode is the number that occurs most frequently in a data set.&lt;br /&gt;
Example - 2, 3, 15, 3, 5, 7, 8, 3, 2, 1, 10, 9.   &lt;br /&gt;
In this data set, 3, is the number that occurs most frequently and would be identified as the mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Scott Trungadi&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Having finally mastered the skills necessary to report my data, and thanks to the help from fellow students in my doctoral program, I was ready to write up a description of what all the numbers meant. I was excited to have reached this point in my central tendency assignment, as there is one thing I love doing, and that is write. Finally, something I might be good at! However, this also meant that I needed to understand and be able to explain what all the numbers meant.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October of 2007 during the kindergarten year, the Letter Naming Fluency&lt;br /&gt;
( LNF) portion of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (Dibels) was administered to a class of 18 kindergarten students, 10 males and 8 females.&lt;br /&gt;
The SPSS helped to process the following data regarding the testing administration. The mean score for the eighteen students for the Beginning LNF portion of Dibels was 32.33 with the median or midpoint being 35.0(Table 1). By gender, the boys in the class scored slightly lower with the mean score of 32.30 and the midpoint or median score of 34.50 as compared to the girls’ mean score of 32.38 and a median of 37.00(Table 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standard deviation is based on all the scores in the group and is determined by how much each score deviates from the mean, or in other words, it is an estimate of what the range of scores probably was. The standard deviation tells me that in the Beginning and Ending LNF administration, all students tested, in a similar range-16.01 and 16.87(Tables 1 and 2).&lt;br /&gt;
However, in looking at the Beginning LNF scores analyzed by gender, there is a large discrepancy between how well the boys did when compared to the girls. There was a higher standard of deviation for the boys than the girls, respectively 16.34 for the boys and 6.71 for the girls. In trying to understand the possible reasons for this, one must consider birthdates. Although birthdates were not considered in this collection of data, it is important to note that there was a higher incidence of younger birth dates for the boys than the girls which might account for this wide range in the boys’ scores.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Z scores in this statistical analysis refer to how many standard deviations a particular raw score lies above or below the group means. Table 6 indicates the range of Z scores for the students who had taken the Ending LNF portion of the Dibels test. The score range from 1.44, or 1.44 standard deviations above the group mean of 64.67 to -1.82, or 1.82 below the group mean of 64.67.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;I actually felt that I began to really understand what everything meant as I was scripting my report. It was very helpful. Hope this helps someone!&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Debbie Mumford&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Skewness and Central Tendency&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Skeweness.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Identifying where the mean, median, and mode are in relation to each other can help to determine the skew of a curve. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a normal distribution, the mean, median, and mode will all be very close (mean = median = mode)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a distribution that is skewed &amp;#039;&amp;#039;left&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, otherwise known as a negatively skewed distribution, it is outliers on the lower end of the number line that is impacting the shape of the curve. In a curve that is skewed left the mean (which is the mathematical average) will be furthest to the left on the number line, the median remains at the mid point of the distribution on the number line, and the mode will be the farthest point to the right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a distribution that is skewed &amp;#039;&amp;#039;right&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, otherwise known as a positively skewed distribution, it is outliers on the higher end of the number line that is impacting the shape of the curve. In a curve that is skewed right the mean (which is the mathematical average) will be furthest to the right on the number line, the median remains at the mid point of the distribution on the number line, and the mode will be the farthest point to the left. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Ashley Brooksbank&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Image citation: Statistics: Basic Statistics II. (n.d.). Retrieved from &amp;#039;&amp;#039;https://guides.douglascollege.ca/c.php?g=408742&amp;amp;p=2970198.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Descriptive Statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Descriptive statistics are very important because if we simply presented our raw data it would be hard to visualize what the data was showing, especially if there was a lot of it. Descriptive statistics therefore enables us to present the data in a more meaningful way, which allows simpler interpretation of the data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measures of central tendency: these are ways of describing the central position of a frequency distribution for a group of data. In this case, the frequency distribution is simply the distribution and pattern of marks scored by the 100 students from the lowest to the highest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measures of spread: these are ways of summarizing a group of data by describing how spread out the scores are. For example, the mean score of our 100 students may be 65 out of 100. However, not all students will have scored 65 marks. Rather, their scores will be spread out. Some will be lower and others higher. Measures of spread help us to summarize how spread out these scores are.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both of these measures are important to calculate through SPSS prior to conducting other analyses as they can speak to you about what your data is saying and inform you of the next steps you should take.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Sheri Prendergast&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most basic statistical concepts in educational research is central tendency, which determines the median or the average of a data set, providing a single figure that can best represent a whole group of observations. The knowledge of central tendency enables teachers to analyze the data at the classroom and school level effectively, and draw conclusions regarding the performance of students and the effectiveness of the instructional process. The three significant measures include mean, median, and mode. The arithmetic mean is the average of all the data points, which is calculated by adding all the data points and dividing them by the number of cases. It suits interval or ratio data that are symmetrically distributed. Mean is, however, sensitive to the outliers with a few very high or very low scores having the ability to skew the mean. The median, the middle value that appears when all the values have been ranked, is not sensitive to extreme values and is applied in the case of skewed data. The mode, which is the most common score, is particularly useful when the data are nominal or categorical, such as the most popular grade or preferred learning style. In the educational sphere, both measures narrate a different tale. The mean reading score in a classroom can be 85, for instance, but the median can be 90, implying that some low achievers dragged the mean score. These measures can be calculated in SPSS under Analyze - Descriptive Statistics - Frequencies. With careful choice and interpretation of the appropriate measure of central tendency, teachers will be able to see trends and detect learning differences, and present findings in a manner that informs teaching and promotes equity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Casimir007&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Casimir007</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Central_Tendency&amp;diff=483</id>
		<title>Central Tendency</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Central_Tendency&amp;diff=483"/>
		<updated>2025-11-14T05:55:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Casimir007: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Central Tendency is commonly referred to as the &amp;quot;measure of central tendency&amp;quot;.  A measure of central tendency is used to describe a data set by identifying the central position within that set of data.  In statistics, the three most commonly used measures of central tendency are mean, median, and mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mean: The mean is the average of all the numbers within a data set.  To find the mean value, one would add up all the values in a data set and divide that sum by the total number of data points within the data set.&lt;br /&gt;
Example - 3+4+5+6+7 = 25.   There are 5 values in this data set.  25/5 = 5.  In this scenario the mean, or average, is 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Median: The median is the middle point in a sorted set of data.  The median is identified by organizing the data set into order of magnitude (starting with the smallest number).&lt;br /&gt;
Once sorted the median is identified as the number directly in the middle of that sorted data.&lt;br /&gt;
Example - 6, 9, 23, 15, 2.  If we put this data set in order by magnitude it is displayed as: 2, 6, 9, 15, 23.  In this data set 9 is the median.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mode: The mode is the number that occurs most frequently in a data set.&lt;br /&gt;
Example - 2, 3, 15, 3, 5, 7, 8, 3, 2, 1, 10, 9.   &lt;br /&gt;
In this data set, 3, is the number that occurs most frequently and would be identified as the mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Scott Trungadi&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Having finally mastered the skills necessary to report my data, and thanks to the help from fellow students in my doctoral program, I was ready to write up a description of what all the numbers meant. I was excited to have reached this point in my central tendency assignment, as there is one thing I love doing, and that is write. Finally, something I might be good at! However, this also meant that I needed to understand and be able to explain what all the numbers meant.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October of 2007 during the kindergarten year, the Letter Naming Fluency&lt;br /&gt;
( LNF) portion of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (Dibels) was administered to a class of 18 kindergarten students, 10 males and 8 females.&lt;br /&gt;
The SPSS helped to process the following data regarding the testing administration. The mean score for the eighteen students for the Beginning LNF portion of Dibels was 32.33 with the median or midpoint being 35.0(Table 1). By gender, the boys in the class scored slightly lower with the mean score of 32.30 and the midpoint or median score of 34.50 as compared to the girls’ mean score of 32.38 and a median of 37.00(Table 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standard deviation is based on all the scores in the group and is determined by how much each score deviates from the mean, or in other words, it is an estimate of what the range of scores probably was. The standard deviation tells me that in the Beginning and Ending LNF administration, all students tested, in a similar range-16.01 and 16.87(Tables 1 and 2).&lt;br /&gt;
However, in looking at the Beginning LNF scores analyzed by gender, there is a large discrepancy between how well the boys did when compared to the girls. There was a higher standard of deviation for the boys than the girls, respectively 16.34 for the boys and 6.71 for the girls. In trying to understand the possible reasons for this, one must consider birthdates. Although birthdates were not considered in this collection of data, it is important to note that there was a higher incidence of younger birth dates for the boys than the girls which might account for this wide range in the boys’ scores.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Z scores in this statistical analysis refer to how many standard deviations a particular raw score lies above or below the group means. Table 6 indicates the range of Z scores for the students who had taken the Ending LNF portion of the Dibels test. The score range from 1.44, or 1.44 standard deviations above the group mean of 64.67 to -1.82, or 1.82 below the group mean of 64.67.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;I actually felt that I began to really understand what everything meant as I was scripting my report. It was very helpful. Hope this helps someone!&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Debbie Mumford&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Skewness and Central Tendency&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Skeweness.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Identifying where the mean, median, and mode are in relation to each other can help to determine the skew of a curve. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a normal distribution, the mean, median, and mode will all be very close (mean = median = mode)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a distribution that is skewed &amp;#039;&amp;#039;left&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, otherwise known as a negatively skewed distribution, it is outliers on the lower end of the number line that is impacting the shape of the curve. In a curve that is skewed left the mean (which is the mathematical average) will be furthest to the left on the number line, the median remains at the mid point of the distribution on the number line, and the mode will be the farthest point to the right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a distribution that is skewed &amp;#039;&amp;#039;right&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, otherwise known as a positively skewed distribution, it is outliers on the higher end of the number line that is impacting the shape of the curve. In a curve that is skewed right the mean (which is the mathematical average) will be furthest to the right on the number line, the median remains at the mid point of the distribution on the number line, and the mode will be the farthest point to the left. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Ashley Brooksbank&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Image citation: Statistics: Basic Statistics II. (n.d.). Retrieved from &amp;#039;&amp;#039;https://guides.douglascollege.ca/c.php?g=408742&amp;amp;p=2970198.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Descriptive Statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Descriptive statistics are very important because if we simply presented our raw data it would be hard to visualize what the data was showing, especially if there was a lot of it. Descriptive statistics therefore enables us to present the data in a more meaningful way, which allows simpler interpretation of the data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measures of central tendency: these are ways of describing the central position of a frequency distribution for a group of data. In this case, the frequency distribution is simply the distribution and pattern of marks scored by the 100 students from the lowest to the highest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measures of spread: these are ways of summarizing a group of data by describing how spread out the scores are. For example, the mean score of our 100 students may be 65 out of 100. However, not all students will have scored 65 marks. Rather, their scores will be spread out. Some will be lower and others higher. Measures of spread help us to summarize how spread out these scores are.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both of these measures are important to calculate through SPSS prior to conducting other analyses as they can speak to you about what your data is saying and inform you of the next steps you should take.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by Sheri Prendergast&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most basic statistical concepts in educational research is central tendency, which determines the median or the average of a data set, providing a single figure that can best represent a whole group of observations. The knowledge of central tendency enables teachers to analyze the data at the classroom and school level effectively, and draw conclusions regarding the performance of students and the effectiveness of the instructional process. The three significant measures include mean, median, and mode. The arithmetic mean is the average of all the data points, which is calculated by adding all the data points and dividing them by the number of cases. It suits interval or ratio data that are symmetrically distributed. Mean is, however, sensitive to the outliers with a few very high or very low scores having the ability to skew the mean. The median, the middle value that appears when all the values have been ranked, is not sensitive to extreme values and is applied in the case of skewed data. The mode, which is the most common score, is particularly useful when the data are nominal or categorical, such as the most popular grade or preferred learning style. In the educational sphere, both measures narrate a different tale. The mean reading score in a classroom can be 85, for instance, but the median can be 90, implying that some low achievers dragged the mean score. These measures can be calculated in SPSS under Analyze - Descriptive Statistics - Frequencies. With careful choice and interpretation of the appropriate measure of central tendency, teachers will be able to see trends and detect learning differences, and present findings in a manner that informs teaching and promotes equity.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Casimir007</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>