<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Writing_samples_for_correlations</id>
	<title>Writing samples for correlations - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Writing_samples_for_correlations"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Writing_samples_for_correlations&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-09-25T00:12:12Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.31.16</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Writing_samples_for_correlations&amp;diff=46&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: Created page with &quot;Below are some examples of written explanations of correlations, with suggested alternatives that are a bit more descriptive.  Remember, statements about correlations should i...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://practicalstats.labanca.net/index.php?title=Writing_samples_for_correlations&amp;diff=46&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2019-08-29T00:15:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Below are some examples of written explanations of correlations, with suggested alternatives that are a bit more descriptive.  Remember, statements about correlations should i...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Below are some examples of written explanations of correlations, with suggested alternatives that are a bit more descriptive.  Remember, statements about correlations should include &amp;lt;font color=red&amp;gt;direction&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;font color=red&amp;gt;magnitude&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;.  They might also include the Pearson or Spearman values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example 1. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a moderated high-high relationship between DRA scores and Reading Screen scores.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=red&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alternative: There is a high positive correlation (r=.74) between DRA scores and Reading Screen scores&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example 2. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at spring DRP and prompt scores, there was a strong, positive linear correlation at the 0.01 level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=red&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alternative:  (the word strong does not have a quantitative value associated with it.) Looking at spring DRP and prompt scores, there was a high, positive linear correlation (r=.88) at the 0.01 level of significance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OR&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at spring DRP and prompt scores, there was a high, positive linear correlation (r=.88) with p&amp;lt;.01.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example 3. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between the OLSAT 07 score and the DRP 07 score is moderately significant at the .05 level&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=red&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alternative:  There is a statistically significant (p&amp;lt;.05) moderate positive correlation (r=.5466) for OLSAT and DRP scores.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example 4. ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the scatterplot graph as well as the Pearson test for correlation I have found out that there is a positive correlation between CMT reading and math scores. There is also a very high significance&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=red&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alternative (remember, APA is written in the third person.):  Scatterplots and Pearson coefficient identify a statistically significant very high positive correlation between CMT reading and math scores.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example 5. ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All Pearson correlation coefficients for Figures 1-3 show extremely high relationships between scores on the two tests being compared. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=red&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alternative: All Pearson correlation coefficients for Figures 1-3 show a very high positive correlation between scores on the two tests being compared.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example 6. ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a high correlation (r=.72) between math and reading scores on the grade 4 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT). Similarly, when grade 4 CMT reading and writing scores are compared, the correlation (r=.74) is high. The correlation (r=.51) between grade 4 CMT math and writing scores is moderate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=red&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alternative: There is a high positive correlation (r=.72) between math and reading scores on the Grade 4 CMT.  Similarly CMT reading and writing scores have a high positive correlation (r=.74).  CMT Math and writing scores have a moderately positive correlation (r=.51).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Example 7. ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Writing scores 07-08 is significant at the 0.05 level with a correlation of 0.450. The relationship is statistically significant but is considered a low-level relationship, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=red&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alternative: Writing scores from 2007 compared to 2008 is statistically significant (p&amp;lt;.05) with a low positive correlation (r=.45).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contributed by WCSU EdD Cohort 3 ED860 students and Frank LaBanca, EdD&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>